Proposal for a qualification system for New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in the food and feed sector: example of implementation for nanomaterial risk assessment

Plenty of new approach methodologies (NAMs) for risk assessment have been developed but only some are included in OECD Test Guidelines (TGs) for regulatory implementation. Nevertheless, NAMs are increasingly applied, e.g. for nanomaterial (NM) risk assessments. The EFSA Guidance on NM risk assessment suggests that NAM‐derived data concerning degradation/dissolution (in relevant biofluids), intestinal uptake/crossing, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, (pro‐)inflammatory potential and barrier integrity, for many of which no OECD TGs exist, have to be evaluated first. Consequently, NM risk assessments involve data from non‐guideline studies, requiring time‐consuming and challenging case‐by‐case evaluations. Establishing an OECD TG is a formal process aiming for international use according to the Mutual Acceptance of Data (MAD). However, not every promising NAM can be prioritised for OECD TGs. A qualification, based on an expert opinion, may enable an efficient use of adequate NAMs for a specific context‐of‐use. Furthermore, it supports the optimisation of promising NAMs for regulatory applications. Existing qualification systems operate in the context of e.g., drug development tools (FDA) and research and development into pharmaceuticals (EMA). The NAMS4NANO consortium was tasked to propose a generic framework for a qualification system for chemical risk assessment in the food and feed sector to speed up the regulatory use of NAMs. Here we describe our proposal including the process and evaluation criteria. A detailed test method description, preferably as standard operating procedures (SOPs), describing the set‐up of the NAM including its application and evaluation phase is crucial. Furthermore, the scientific validity, i.e. its reliability and relevance for the context‐of‐use, needs to be demonstrated, for which we suggest a less rigorous process compared to OECD TGs. We propose to initially establish a qualification system for NM risk assessment, aligned with the EFSA framework. This document is an interim version to stipulate a broader discussion among experts and stakeholders.